Age based reservation in Indian politics (Satire)
[info]qazomilt
Age based reservation in Indian politics (Satire)

Ganguly is out of the one day team. I suppose a golden duck is enough to throw him out of the reckoning, though age and agility have been touted as the underlying reasons. I wish we were as strict with the non-performers in the government offices. I wish we followed the policy of sacking politicians on age and non-performance basis. There is no fool proof method of ensuring that senile leaders don't win election. In a country where we use the excuse of age to let the batsman in best form and other two with their proven record sit out in a series against Australia, it is too incredible to see bare chested forty plus, Shah Rukh Khan being accepted in role of twenty year olds, and an even older Rajnikant gross billions as young and dashing protagonist in Sivaji. Yet I am here not to praise the aged, but bury them.

In the following text copied from Wikipedia, we have the age based statistics of India for coming years:

*****

Table 2: Population Projections (in millions)

Year Under 15 15-64 65+ Total
2000 361 604 45 1010
2005 368 673 51 1093
2010 370 747 58 1175
2015 372 819 65 1256
2020 373 882 76 1331

Source: Based on P.N. Mari Bhat, "Indian Demographic Scenario 2025", Institute of Economic Growth, New Delhi, Discussion Paper No. 27/2001.

*****

In a country where we have reservation for everything, including communities that together constitute the majority of population, it is disheartening to see the minority -- old people -- are ruling the nation. While people above the age of 65 constitute only 5% of Indian population, they hold most of the offices of value, including ministries and the presidency. The 33% people, all below the age of 15, are totally unrepresented. Their daddies and mummies (who are fighting against >65 saasus or mothers-in-law) are also under-represented. I suppose and propose age based reservation to get rid of the bias. The lack of age base equality has lead to gross miscalculation of India's needs and priorities by a minority, age-old political community. No wonder they harp about things that ended with fall of Berlin Wall or crumbling of Russian Empire. No wonder they still think of subsidies in government ration shops and caste-based reservation as the only viable means of making a large section of people happy. Wake up! The share of government as an employer of value has dwindled to the degree that was unimaginable twenty years ago. (I guess they woke up to that possibility, so the brand new education and industrial policy wants to impose caste-based affirmative action everywhere).

We need young leaders. Nearly half of India in 2015 will comprise of people who were born and grew up after the onset of globalization. Nearly half of the Indians by 2015 will have no connection or sentimental attachment to Gandhi family and so candidature of Rahul Gandhi and policies of Congress party that revolve around him are doomed. Nearly half of the country would have no recollection of the fall of Babri Masjid or Advani's Rath Yatra and so BJP needs to reinvent itself. Nearly half of the country would have grown up with hundreds of channels to choose from (including MTV and Fashion TV), will have no televised Ramayana or Mahabharata serials in their memory, and with Tendulkar as their only cricket icon since their birth. The country's morals and regional values would have plummeted beyond recognition. Most of the working class in next decade will comprise of people who would have no recollection of waiting lines for telephones, cars, scooters and so on that existed in pre-globalization era. Most educated ones will lack capacity to read and write well in their local, ancestral languages, and most would have no recollection of wars with Pakistan, China or riots/blasts in Mumbai. Many would have studied from politically correct bland textbooks and many would have dropped out after high school for high paying BPO night shifts. Many would have grown up in nuclear families, many without siblings and too many with digitized dreams. Most wouldn't know of the Emergency, the lack of Coca Cola for over a decade, the militancy in Panjab and that Pandits ever lived in Kashmir. To give them representation, to give them a voice, to address their concerns and needs requires a fresh breed of leaders, that can be nourished only by age based reservation.

For centuries people of young age have been kept under the rule of old people. Old people have always had a position of privilige that they have ever used in promoting more old people. Old age is hereditary. The improvement in health services has only increased the potency of old age. viagra cialis online pharmacy pharmacy is perhaps responsible for many old leaders continuing to rule even after their retirement age is past due. Even where the father has been minister or politician for thirty to forty years (intermittently at times), the children have to wait till they reach necessary old age to become leaders. The injustice that has continued for centuries must be addressed in a fashion similar to how caste based divisions have been repressed (or was it re-stressed) by reservation. It is high time that the young ones in India launch a struggle to disband the tribe of the minority old people who are occupying the positions of worth. The time has come for the young to truly snatch what is rightfully theirs. In the democracy the majority must rule, and by reservation, we ensure just that. So be it the realm of caste or age, we must follow the policy of affirmative action. The under-represented, under-valued youth in India needs empowerment.

The youth need their rightful say in the governance and decision making. We must re-prescribe the Hindu tradition of Vanaprastha (leaving material life for life in forests) for old people. This will force new blood in the political world of India, and simultaneously increase the number of people leading pious and religious life in the country. Well, for the benefits of Vanaprastha and Sanyasa (total giving up of worldliness), I will ask you to refer to Vedas, Upanishads or maybe their German translations that have been subsequently translated into titles like "Hinduism for Dummies" (or will be translated into such titles). This is no time to let the old lurk as rulers and hurdles in the progress of the majority, the vibrant, the young in India. An age based reservation in politics is the need of the hour.

So, What Are the Treatment Options For ED?
[info]qazomilt
See also: cheap viagra | 

So, What Are the Treatment Options For ED?

Are There Herbal Substitutes for Viagra?

Some herbalists suggest that certain herbs, Asian ginseng, ashwagandha and ginkgo can be used to boost desire and sexual energy, however, there is little evidence to support these claims. Actually, the most effective treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) at this time, is using Viagra or a similar prescription drug, such as cialis or Levitra.

What about Cost? Is There A Generic Viagra?

In a word, NO. There is no legal generic for Viagra, as this medication is still under patent by Phizer. You may have seen advertisements promoting generic Viagra, Cialis and Levitra; however, it is very likely these are not genuine ED medications.

What If You Just Don't Want To Talk About It?

Mayo clinic has determined patients are more honest when completing a medical history on a computer rather than in a face-to-face interview with their physician. Personal consultations can become intimidating and the patient has the tendency to "leave out" important symptoms, especially if they become embarrassed during the interview. If this is a concern and you feel that discussing your condition face-to-face with a physician is something you just don't feel comfortable with, you could consider using a reputable online pharmacy. You may find that an online physician consultation is not only less embarrassing, but also less expensive.

So How Do I Know I'm Really Getting Viagra?

While there are numerous websites that sell drugs that look authentic, you have to make sure their products are genuine FDA approved medications and not look-alike products manufactured in China, India or Africa. There are, however, ways you can determine if the online pharmacy is reputable.

First, you need to make sure the pharmacy has been granted regulatory approval and only employs US licensed physicians and pharmacists. Also, you need to verify the pharmacy is supervised by both a Pharmacy and Medical Board. If you are able to verify the above, you can be assured you are dealing with a reputable online pharmacy and that the medication you are being prescribed is a genuine FDA-approved medication.

So, Will Viagra Really Help Me?

It's true there are certain physical conditions that precede ED, such as heart disease and diabetes. However, some patients ED is brought about by their emotional state. Untreated depression and excessive stress and anxiety are often common contributors to ED. Another contributor to ED is excessive use of alcohol and tobacco.

If you are under a lot of stress or dealing with depression, you might want to consider starting a daily exercise routine. Just walking 30 minutes a day will increase blood flow, reduce stress and should improve your mood. Regular exercise will also cut your risk for future development of diabetes and heart disease.

If the underlying cause of ED is rooted in a physical cause, not emotional, Viagra, should be able to provide the support you need to conquer ED.

Cautions to Consider.

Because ED can develop from one or several factors, it's important that you seek a consultation from a qualified physician to rule out any possible medical conditions. Whether you decide to go to your family physician or seek assistance from a qualified online pharmacy is your choice. If you believe you would be more comfortable working with an online physician, please keep in mind the cautions mentioned above. It is imperative that the pharmacy employs US licensed physicians and pharmacists and it must have been granted regulatory approval. If you can determine those two facts, you can be assured you are dealing with a reputable online pharmacy that will provide you quality service and prescribe genuine FDA approved medications.


blue pill viagra - blue penis
[info]qazomilt

Recently the hospital received 30-year-old man with a blue penis. At 30 years old man suffered from erectile dysfunction.
He took two cheap cialis viagra levitra and washed down with juice and to have sex with his girlfriend.
After sex, his penis was still standing. Penis was another 6 hours. The man broke down and hit his penis with a hammer. His girlfriend called the doctor.
What happens next is unknown. Good luck to him. And my advice to you is eat a current one blue pill viagra at once.

When Men's Health Doesn't Count
[info]qazomilt
When Men's Health Doesn't Count
By Dianna Thompson and Glenn Sacks

Congress is sending a message to American purchase cialis: men's health doesn't count.

The disturbing health and mortality disparities between American whites and blacks are well known, but most people do not realize that the health and mortality disparities between women and cialis are just as great. For example, the gap in life expectancy between whites and blacks is six years, while the gender gap is 5.7 years. Adjusted for age, men are 1.6 times as likely as women to die from one of the top 10 causes of death, and blacks are 1.5 times as likely to die from them as whites.

Despite this, it is women's health, not men's, which continues to receive government attention and funding. For example, the National Institutes of Health--the federal focal point for medical research in the U.S.--spends nearly four times as much on female-specific health research as on male-specific research. And though the average man is as likely to die from prostate cancer as the average woman is from breast cancer, the Department of Health and Human Services' National Cancer Institute spends three and a half times as much money on breast cancer research as on prostate cancer research.

In fact, prostate cancer makes up 37% of all cancer cases but receives only 5% of federal research funding. In addition, the breast cancer postage stamp has raised over $25 million for breast cancer research since it began in 1998, while a 1999 bill proposing a similar stamp for prostate cancer research was unsuccessful.

When Congress formed the Office on Women's Health in 1991, its goal was to improve women's health by directing and coordinating women's health research, health care services, and health education. Since then men's health advocates have been trying to create an Office of Men's Health, with the goal of duplicating the OWH's success. Yet while a new bill which will help to make the OWH's funding permanent was just passed by the House, the Men's Health Act of 2001 (H.R. 632) remains trapped in the House Energy and Commerce Committee's subcommittee on health. If not rescued soon, the bill will die when the 107th Congress adjourns this fall.

According to Tracie Snitker, director of public affairs for the Men's Health Network, "the number and quality of federally funded women's health education projects is outstanding. But while outreach programs teach women about breast cancer and cervical cancer, there are few if any programs which educate men about their own gender-specific health needs.

"We want to do for men what the OWH has done for women," she adds. "Men need education about the cancers which disproportionately affect them, such as prostate cancer, skin cancer and colorectal cancer. Young men need education on testicular cancer. Most importantly, we need to teach men to seek preventative health care."

Part of the reason an Office of Men's Health has been so long in coming is the common but nonetheless false perception that the government and the scientific community have paid more attention to men's health than to women's. In 1990 Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) made national headlines by citing the fact that women-specific health research comprised only 14% of the budget of the National Institute of Health (NIH). She called it "blatant discrimination" and led the successful campaign for the creation of the OWH. What Mikulski and many in the media who publicized Mikulski's claims did not understand was that only 6.5% of the NIH's budget went to male-specific research--the vast majority of the NIH's research was gender neutral.

Today the disparity in favor of women in NIH research has grown, as has the gender disparity in enrollments in non-gender-specific studies. According to the Government Accounting Office, one of the few areas where men comprise the majority of research subjects is in initial trials of experimental drugs. These are the trials undertaken to ensure that the drugs are not lethal or seriously harmful.

First, drugs are usually tested on rats and monkeys. If there are no adverse effects, they are then tested on people--usually men. If the men also show no adverse effects, the drugs advance to larger trials, where women comprise the majority.

Considering Congress' repeated refusal to act to help men's health, one can't help but wonder--is men's health as important as women's, or is it merely more important than monkeys'?


You are viewing [info]qazomilt's journal